News:

It's Spring Time   ... 

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Peter Holden - Today at 09:37 PM
The one they should have built was the 100 inch, there was  aphoto of a S1 100" pickup prototype but I cant find it

Peter
#2
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Gres - Today at 09:05 PM
Once you are actually driving around there are a surprising number of people who notice, some even nod or wave. Anything other than a modern bland black blob is quite unusual.
#3
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by cswagon - Today at 09:01 PM
As you've already got both why don't you get them both on the road then make your own mind up.
I've owned 3 80", 2 86" and too many 88" to remember but once I drove a 109 I wouldn't drive anything else.
Being my only transport, they're so much more useful for what I carry and in my opinion so much smoother without all the bucking up and down.
They aren't as easy to manoeuvre but that's easily off-set against the rest.
But then everyone has their own opinion and needs, and not many use it as their daily.
#4
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Bigdog - Today at 08:56 PM
It would just be nice to have something that's classed as a classic and not just an old Land Rover running down the road, that's where I think the 109 differs from the 88
#5
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Wittsend - Today at 08:44 PM
It's the way you are thinking ...

You're not doing it up for other people, it's for you !
You shouldn't be worrying about what other people think - life's too short.

 :hinges


#6
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Bigdog - Today at 08:36 PM
It's just that my 109 that I have been doing up is almost ready for the road but I just have that feeling that no one will look upon it the same way as an 88, even though it's a 1970 series 2a Land Rover, but maybe not maybe it's just the way I am thinking
#7
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by GlenAnderson - Today at 08:12 PM
Quote from: Gareth on Today at 07:51 PMI've had an 88 and got a 109. 88's are more manageable to drive so perhaps that has something to do with it? The 109 is far smoother to drive though.

Aesthetically the 88 probably looks more pleasing than a 109.

Personally, I think the 109" is much better proportioned.

Once you got beyond a basic 88", and started adding options, the price ramped up really quickly; so I think that most new buyers would choose an 88" if they could get away with one, and only pay for the bigger vehicle if they really needed to. As a result, the 88" is/was more "popular", but not necessarily the better vehicle. I have had both, and much prefer the 109", as not only does it have a more useable load capacity, they drive so much nicer. They have always been harder to find and more expensive though, in my experience, as I think a lot more of them simply got worked to death.

It's all subjective though. YMMV.

#8
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Wittsend - Today at 08:11 PM
Horses for courses ....

#9
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Gareth - Today at 07:51 PM
I've had an 88 and got a 109. 88's are more manageable to drive so perhaps that has something to do with it? The 109 is far smoother to drive though.

Aesthetically the 88 probably looks more pleasing than a 109.
#10
General Discussion / Re: 109 v 88
Last post by Birdsnest55 - Today at 07:44 PM
Turning circle on the 88" is better and they fit in smaller spaces.
Not everyone has driven a 109" I prefer them as they are smoother on the road.

Paul